New Testament track · step 5 of 6 · ← matching OT step

New Testament · Step 5
Abiding states and continuity of practice
The question many meditators eventually ask is: what is it called when someone does not just visit the divine state but lives in it? Below is a sourced answer and four key terms.
The term for a master who remains in the divine state all the time
Short answer: the uninterrupted state is called sahaja (“natural”), in full sahaja samadhi or sahaja nirvikalpa samadhi. The person who has realised it and lives on in the body is a jivanmukta (“liberated while living”). The Bhagavad Gita’s word for the same ideal is sthitaprajna, “one of steady wisdom,” also called samādhi-stha, “established in samadhi.”
- Ramana Maharshi: “Remaining in the primal, pure natural state without effort is Sahaja Nirvikalpa Samādhi.” (Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi, Talk 391)
- Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna, glossary: “Sahaja: … also the natural state.” Also: “jivanmukta: One liberated from maya while living in the body.” (glossary)
- Ramakrishna: “He who has attained this Knowledge of Brahman is a jivanmukta, liberated while living in the body.” (Gospel, ch. 37)
- Bhagavad Gita 2.54: Arjuna asks about “sthitaprajñasya … samādhisthasya”, the one of steady wisdom, established in samadhi, and how such a person speaks, sits and walks. (Sanskrit text and translation, shlokam.org; overview)
There is no single official title. Sahaja names the state, while jivanmukta and sthitaprajna name the person. “Paramahamsa” is sometimes used loosely for such a master, but the Gospel glossary defines it as “one belonging to the highest order of sannyasis,” which is a monastic rank and not the state itself (glossary).
Four key terms
- Sahaja samadhi: the natural, continuous state
-
“Remaining in the primal, pure natural state without effort is Sahaja Nirvikalpa Samādhi.”— Ramana Maharshi, Talks, Talk 391 · source
In Talk 187 Ramana contrasts it with kevala (temporary) nirvikalpa samadhi. In kevala samadhi the mind is “like a bucket with the rope, left lying in the water in a well … to be drawn out by the other end of the rope.” In sahaja it is “like a river discharged into the ocean and its identity lost” (Talk 187; the same table appears in Maharshi’s Gospel). The Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna records the Bauls calling “the state of perfection … the ‘sahaja’, the ‘natural’ state” (ch. 27).
Terminology note: Yogananda uses “nirbikalpa” for what Ramana calls sahaja, a state in which one “moves freely in the world and performs his outward duties without any loss of God-realization” (Autobiography, ch. 43, fn. 1). Usage varies between teachers, so always check whose definitions you are reading.
- Bhava samadhi: ecstatic devotional absorption
-
“Ecstasy in which the devotee retains his ego and enjoys communion with the Personal God.”— Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna, glossary, “bhava samadhi” · source
“Second, bhava samadhi: one attains this by following the path of bhakti. In this second samadhi a trace of ego remains, like a line, in order to enable the devotee to enjoy God, to taste His lila.”— Sri Ramakrishna, Gospel, ch. 42 “The Car Festival” · source
The Gospel repeatedly shows Ramakrishna going into samadhi during devotional singing and dancing. Its introduction describes him moving between devotion and absorption in the Absolute:
“Ecstatic devotion to the Divine Mother alternated with serene absorption in the Ocean of Absolute Unity.”— Gospel, Introduction, “Kali and Maya” (Nikhilananda). The same passage says he was asked to remain “in bhavamukha … the border line between the Absolute and the Relative.” · source
- Nirvikalpa samadhi: absorption without distinctions
-
“The highest tate of samadhi, in which the aspirant realizes his total oneness with Brahman.”— Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna, glossary (the typo “tate” is in the source) · source
“Merging in Reality and remaining unaware of the world is nirvikalpa samādhi.”— Ramana Maharshi, Talks, Talk 391 · source
“In nirvikalpa samadhi ego, name, and form do not exist.”— Sri Ramakrishna, Gospel, ch. 24 · source
Its counterpart, savikalpa samadhi, is “communion with God in which the distinction between subject and object is retained” (glossary).
- Jivanmukta: one liberated while living
-
“jivanmukta: One liberated from maya while living in the body.”— Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna, glossary · source
“Even after attaining Knowledge through the guru's grace, one can very well live in the world as a jivanmukta.”— Sri Ramakrishna, Gospel, ch. 11 · source
“A SIDDHA (“perfected being”) has progressed from the state of a JIVANMUKTA (“freed while living”) to that of a PARAMUKTA (“supremely free”-full power over death)”— Yogananda, Autobiography of a Yogi, ch. 33 · source
The opposite term is videhamukti, liberation after death. Jivanmukti is accepted by Advaita Vedanta and by the Yoga tradition (Wikipedia overview, with scholarly references).
More below: the jivanmukta and the holy touch: the word, its texts, darshan, shaktipat, and the touch in the Gospels and in Ramakrishna’s life.
The jivanmukta and the holy touch
Many people meet the word jivanmukta as a name for a pure, holy person whose presence or touch seems to carry power. This section separates what the word itself means from the related ideas of darshan, shaktipat and diksha, then sets the Indian accounts beside the New Testament’s accounts of healing touch. It ends with the warnings both traditions give.
The word
jīvanmukta (जीवन्मुक्त) = jīvan (“living”, from jīva, life, the living soul) + mukta (“released, liberated”, past participle of the root muc, “to loosen, release”). Literally, “liberated while living.” The state is jīvanmukti. Its counterpart is videhamukti, liberation at the death of the body.
“Jīvanmukta (Sanskrit: जीवन्मुक्त) is an adjective derived from the Sanskrit noun जीव jīva, 'life', and the past participle of the verb मुच् much, or IAST muc, 'to liberate'”— Wikipedia, “Jivanmukta” (with scholarly references) · source
Definitions from the sources
“jivanmukta: One liberated from maya while living in the body.”— Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna, glossary · source
“He who has attained this Knowledge of Brahman is a jivanmukta, liberated while living in the body.”— Sri Ramakrishna, Gospel, ch. 37 · source
“The mind of the Sage who has realized the Self is wholly destroyed. It is dead. But to the onlooker, he may seem to possess a mind just like the layman.”— Maharshi’s Gospel (Ramana Maharshi) · source
The Bhagavad Gita never uses the word jivanmukta, but its portrait of the sthitaprajna, “one of steady mind” (2.55–72), is the classic description of the liberated person still living in the world:
“When a man, O son of Prithâ! abandons all the desires of his heart, and is pleased in his self only and by his self, he is then called one of steady mind. He whose heart is not agitated in the midst of calamities, who has no longing for pleasures, and from whom (the feelings of) affection, fear, and wrath have departed, is called a sage of steady mind.”— Gita 2.55–56, tr. K. T. Telang (1882; footnote numbers and page markers omitted) · source
Strictly, then, jivanmukta names inner freedom, not a power. Indian sources do not say every jivanmukta transmits anything by touch. The “holy touch” belongs to a related set of ideas about the guru, described next.
Darshan, shaktipat and diksha
- Darshan: “seeing” and being seen by the holy
“the beholding of a deity (especially in image form), revered person, or sacred object. The experience is considered to be reciprocal and results in the human viewer’s receiving a blessing.”— Encyclopaedia Britannica, “darshan” · source
Britannica adds that darshan “is also imparted by gurus.” Ramana Maharshi described the same reciprocity: “the devotee’s ignorance, like the phantom of darkness, vanishes at the look of the Guru” (Maharshi’s Gospel).
- Shaktipat: the “descent of power”
“the transmission (or conferring) of spiritual energy upon one person by another or directly from the deity”— Wikipedia, “Shaktipat” (śakti, power + pāta, to fall) · source
The same article says it can be given “by a look, thought or touch,” and that it is “considered an act of grace … It cannot be imposed by force, nor can a receiver make it happen.”
- Diksha: initiation, including by touch
“Initiation by touch is called sparśa dīkṣā. The bestowing of divine grace through diksa is sometimes called śaktipāta.”— Wikipedia, “Diksha” · source
- Transmission in silence
“Compare him with another, who sits in a holy presence and goes away after sometime with his outlook on life totally changed. Which is better, to preach loudly without effect or to sit silently sending out inner force?”— Ramana Maharshi, Maharshi’s Gospel, “Silence and Solitude” · source
Ramakrishna and Narendra (Vivekananda)
Swami Nikhilananda’s introduction to the Gospel records three touches during the young Narendra’s first visits:
“During his second visit, about a month later, suddenly, at the touch of the Master, Narendra felt overwhelmed and saw the walls of the room and everything around him whirling and vanishing. 'What are you doing to me?' he cried in terror. 'I have my father and mother at home.'”— Gospel, Introduction, “Narendra” · source
“Sri Ramakrishna came out of his room and gently touched him. Spellbound, he immediately perceived that everything in the world was indeed God.”— Gospel, Introduction, “Narendra” · source
“This time, at the Master's touch, he lost consciousness entirely.”— Gospel, Introduction, “Narendra” · source
Near the end, at Cossipore, the same account describes a transmission without touch:
“Narendra felt the penetration of a subtle force and lost all outer consciousness. Regaining presently the normal mood, he found the Master weeping. Sri Ramakrishna said to him: "Today I have given you my all and I am now only a poor fakir, possessing nothing."”— Gospel, Introduction, “Last Days at Cossipore” · source
Kalpataru Day: January 1, 1886
“On January 1, 1886, he felt better and came down to the garden for a little stroll.”— Gospel, Introduction, “Last Days at Cossipore” · source
“He touched them all, and each received an appropriate benediction. Each of them, at the touch of the Master, experienced ineffable bliss. Some laughed, some wept, some sat down to meditate, some began to pray. Some saw light, some had visions of their Chosen Ideals, and some felt within their bodies the rush of spiritual power.”— Gospel, Introduction, “Last Days at Cossipore” · source
The Gospel glossary defines Kalpataru as “The Wish-fulfilling Tree; refers to God” (glossary). The disciple Ramachandra Dutta named the anniversary “Kalpataru Day.” It is still kept every January 1 by the Ramakrishna Order (Wikipedia, “Kalpataru Day”).
Yogananda and Sri Yukteswar
“He struck gently on my chest above the heart. My body became immovably rooted; breath was drawn out of my lungs as if by some huge magnet. Soul and mind instantly lost their physical bondage, and streamed out like a fluid piercing light from my every pore.”— Yogananda, Autobiography of a Yogi, ch. 14, “An Experience in Cosmic Consciousness” · source
The New Testament: power that “went out” through touch
“And a certain woman, which had an issue of blood twelve years, And had suffered many things of many physicians, and had spent all that she had, and was nothing bettered, but rather grew worse, When she had heard of Jesus, came in the press behind, and touched his garment. For she said, If I may touch but his clothes, I shall be whole. And straightway the fountain of her blood was dried up; and she felt in her body that she was healed of that plague. And Jesus, immediately knowing in himself that virtue had gone out of him, turned him about in the press, and said, Who touched my clothes? And his disciples said unto him, Thou seest the multitude thronging thee, and sayest thou, Who touched me? And he looked round about to see her that had done this thing. But the woman fearing and trembling, knowing what was done in her, came and fell down before him, and told him all the truth. And he said unto her, Daughter, thy faith hath made thee whole; go in peace, and be whole of thy plague.”— Mark 5:25-34, KJV · source · compare: YLT · NRSVue · ESV · NIV
Luke 8:46
| KJVpublic domain | “And Jesus said, Somebody hath touched me: for I perceive that virtue is gone out of me.” | source |
|---|---|---|
| NRSV (NRSVue)© publisher · short quote | “Someone touched me, for I noticed that power had gone out from me.” | source |
| ESV© publisher · short quote | “Someone touched me, for I perceive that power has gone out from me.” | source |
| NIV© publisher · short quote | “Someone touched me; I know that power has gone out from me.” | source |
Luke tells the same story in 8:43–48, ending “Daughter, be of good comfort: thy faith hath made thee whole; go in peace” (Luke 8:43–48, KJV).
“And the whole multitude sought to touch him: for there went virtue out of him, and healed them all.”— Luke 6:19, KJV · source · compare: YLT · NRSVue · ESV · NIV
“And besought him that they might only touch the hem of his garment: and as many as touched were made perfectly whole.”— Matthew 14:36, KJV · source · compare: YLT · NRSVue · ESV · NIV
In Acts the same power is described as passing through the apostles, even through cloth or a shadow:
“Insomuch that they brought forth the sick into the streets, and laid them on beds and couches, that at the least the shadow of Peter passing by might overshadow some of them.”— Acts 5:15, KJV · source · compare: YLT · NRSVue · ESV · NIV
“And God wrought special miracles by the hands of Paul: So that from his body were brought unto the sick handkerchiefs or aprons, and the diseases departed from them, and the evil spirits went out of them.”— Acts 19:11-12, KJV · source · compare: YLT · NRSVue · ESV · NIV
The laying on of hands also conveys the Spirit and a spiritual gift, which is the nearest New Testament parallel to diksha:
“Then laid they their hands on them, and they received the Holy Ghost.”— Acts 8:17, KJV · source · compare: YLT · NRSVue · ESV · NIV
“Wherefore I put thee in remembrance that thou stir up the gift of God, which is in thee by the putting on of my hands.”— 2 Timothy 1:6, KJV · source · compare: YLT · NRSVue · ESV · NIV
Resemblance. The accounts share a striking shape. Something flows outward from a holy person, through touch (Mark 5; Narendra), through a hand on the chest (Yukteswar) or through presence alone (Acts 5:15; Ramana’s “inner force”). The person giving it is aware of it: Jesus perceives “virtue is gone out of me,” and Ramakrishna says “I have given you my all.” The receiver’s experience is bodily as well as spiritual: the woman “felt in her body that she was healed,” and the Cossipore devotees “felt within their bodies the rush of spiritual power.” The laying on of hands in Acts 8 and 2 Timothy 1 (a gift passed from teacher to student) is close in form to initiation by touch (sparśa dīkṣā).
Difference. In the Gospels the touch mostly heals the body, and Acts says that “God wrought” the miracles through Paul. The Indian accounts mostly describe touch that changes consciousness: the world “vanishing,” seeing that “everything … was indeed God,” cosmic consciousness. Christian theology credits the Holy Spirit, not the apostle’s own attainment. Indian sources attribute the effect to the guru’s realisation or to grace working through him. The word jivanmukta itself, as shown above, describes the freedom, not the touch.
Why the traditions warn against treating the touch as magic
Both traditions surround these stories with cautions. They stress that the touch is not a technique, a commodity or a substitute for practice.
- The receiver’s faith and readiness matter. Jesus credits the woman, not the touch: “Daughter, thy faith hath made thee whole” (Mark 5:34). Yogananda says of his own experience: “The experience can never be given through one’s mere intellectual willingness or open-mindedness. Only adequate enlargement by yoga practice and devotional BHAKTI can prepare the mind to absorb the liberating shock of omnipresence” (Autobiography, ch. 14).
- It cannot be bought. When Simon the magician offered money for the power of laying on hands, Peter answered: “Thy money perish with thee, because thou hast thought that the gift of God may be purchased with money” (Acts 8:18–20).
- It cannot be imitated. The sons of Sceva used Jesus’ name as a formula, and the spirit answered “Jesus I know, and Paul I know; but who are ye?” (Acts 19:13–16).
- Grace, not force. Shaktipat “cannot be imposed by force, nor can a receiver make it happen” (Wikipedia). Ramana places the real work inside: “the Guru, who is God or the Self Incarnate, works from within” (Maharshi’s Gospel).
- The giver is wary too. Ramakrishna refused to use yogic power to heal his own throat (“How can I withdraw the mind from the Lotus Feet of God and turn it to this worthless cage of flesh and blood?”). Near death he said he would be taken away “lest, finding me guileless and foolish, people should take advantage of me and persuade me to bestow on them the rare gifts of spirituality” (Gospel, Introduction). Elsewhere he ranked healing low: “With healing and the like one may do only a little good to others” (Gospel, ch. 14).
- Experiences can unsettle. Narendra cried out “in terror” at the first touch. The Ramakrishna Math at Cossipore’s own account of Kalpataru Day says that for one devotee, Vaikuntha, “the visions persisted and interfered with daily life, so that he feared that he might be going insane” (rkmudyanbati.org).
A practical note. Read together, these warnings point the same way. The holy touch in these stories comes unsought, from people who had given up seeking power, to receivers who were already turned toward God. A meditator can honour these accounts without chasing them. The test, in the words of Gita 12.13 (Step 6) and Galatians 5:22–23, is the fruit: friendliness, compassion, freedom from ego. Any teacher who sells initiation, insists on physical contact, or makes touch a condition of progress is acting against what both traditions teach. See also Step 4b on why powers are treated as by-products.
Continuity of practice
The New Testament has no technical vocabulary for “abiding samadhi,” but it does talk about abiding. The visions of Step 4 are moments. The indwelling of Step 3 (“I in you”) is described as lasting. Read that way, the New Testament arc runs from the mountain-top back down into ordinary life. The disciples come down from the Transfiguration, and Paul goes back to work after the third heaven.
The Indian teachers trace a similar arc: from kevala (temporary) samadhi to sahaja (natural, continuous) samadhi. Ramana, asked when to practise sahaja, answered “Even from the beginning” (compiled sayings, secondary source). For a practitioner, the shared lesson is to keep the daily practice of Step 1 going whatever experiences come, and to judge it by steadiness, kindness and freedom from ego rather than by visions. The Gita’s portrait of the sthitaprajna (2.55–72) and Paul’s “fruit of the Spirit” (Gal 5:22–23) both measure progress that way.
Eastern perspective · Upanishads · Gita
Abiding and release: the knot of the heart
John speaks of abiding in the vine and of eternal life now. The Upanishads speak of a knot in the heart that is loosened when the One is seen, and of a person who becomes “immortal” while still alive.
“The knot of the heart is loosened, All doubts are cut off, And one’s deeds (karman) cease When He is seen—both the higher and the lower.”— Mundaka Upanishad 2.2.8, tr. R. E. Hume, The Thirteen Principal Upanishads (1921) · source
“He, verily, who knows that supreme Brahma, becomes very Brahma. … He crosses over sorrow. He crosses over sin (pāpman). Liberated from the knots of the heart, he becomes immortal.”— Mundaka Upanishad 3.2.9, tr. R. E. Hume, The Thirteen Principal Upanishads (1921) · source
“When are liberated all The desires that lodge in one’s heart, Then a mortal becomes immortal! Therein he reaches Brahma! As the slough of a snake lies on an ant-hill, dead, cast off, even so lies this body. But this incorporeal, immortal Life (prāṇa) is Brahma indeed, is light indeed.”— Brihadaranyaka Upanishad 4.4.7, tr. R. E. Hume, The Thirteen Principal Upanishads (1921) · source
“He into whom all objects of desire enter, as waters enter the ocean, which, (though) replenished, (still) keeps its position unmoved,-he only obtains tranquillity”— Gita 2.70, tr. K. T. Telang (1882) · source
“Abide in me, and I in you” and “when He is seen … the knot of the heart is loosened” both describe a life rooted somewhere deeper than the self’s anxieties. The Gita’s ocean, which stays still while rivers pour in, is a picture of what abiding feels like from inside. John names that root as a person, the vine; the Upanishads name it Brahman.
Where the traditions differ
For John eternal life is a gift through Christ and includes the resurrection of the body; for the Upanishads immortality is knowing the deathless Self, and the body is “cast off” like a snake’s skin. Most Hindu schools teach rebirth until release; mainstream Christianity does not.
Light thread
“Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid.”— Matthew 5:14, KJV · source
“And was transfigured before them: and his face did shine as the sun, and his raiment was white as the light.”— Matthew 17:2, KJV · source
“His face did shine as the sun”: the Gospels show the light of a life fully abiding in God. Brihadaranyaka 4.4.7 ends the same way: the freed life “is light indeed”.